Ten Reasons to Ignore Jim Cramer’s Advice
(Author’s Note: Although originally published Dec.12, 2007, I believe the reasoning of this article continues to hold true in 2012. As a follow-up article to this, CXO Advisory Group has written about and tracks Cramer’s success rate.)
CNBC’s Jim Cramer may be a popular television entertainer, but whether he’s helping investors is another matter. This question was brought to my attention recently in a sharp exchange on the web site Dow Jones MarketWatch between Cramer and Paul B. Farrell, a MarketWatch columnist who has earned my respect.
Paul Farrell is a veteran of business and Wall Street. He’s also the author of nine books, including The Lazy Person’s Guide to Investing. Recently, he watched Cramer’s Mad Money on CNBC and was not amused. In addition to costing viewers their valuable time, he wrote, “Cramer’s wild TV antics also are likely to cost them money.” Paul made a powerful case that intelligently selected “lazy portfolios” outperform the active stock trading advocated by Cramer.
The CNBC host shot back. In a rebuttal, Cramer wrote that Farrell had mischaracterized his show and motives. Among his other points, Cramer claimed that he pushed his viewers hard to do their homework on stocks, not just mindlessly trade. He also sets up a straw man, essentially accusing Farrell of saying his viewers are idiots.
I give Farrell the match on points. But more needs to be said. Cramer may be entertaining, and he’s undeniably popular. But I worry particularly about his effect on young people starting out (the average age of his audience is reported to be 28), who are likely to be too heavily influenced by television. Cramer’s response to Farrell focused my concerns.
Here are 10 reasons I don’t trust Jim Cramer:
Reason No. 1: Cramer underplays the costs of active trading.
In his rebuttal to Farrell, Cramer writes, “it’s certainly possible to make a lot of money trading actively, but, as anyone who’s watched the show a few times knows, I don’t encourage ordinary people to trade.” Yes, it’s possible. But is it probable? No. How many studies will it take to convince people that active stock trading is counterproductive?
Reason No. 2: Big promises to viewers are based on shaky evidence.
The implication of Cramer’s pitch is that he will lead you to the investment promised land. Cramer is widely regarded as brilliant. Farrell generously writes: “Jim Cramer is a brilliant trader.”
Nonsense. How do we know he’s brilliant? Because of short-term performance? Remember that the No. 1 mutual-fund manager of the 1970s, David Baker of 44 Wall Street Fund, was dead last in the 1980s. Where’s the evidence that Cramer can produce these stellar returns for his viewers?
Reason No. 3: Cramer as pander bear.
Throughout the article Cramer plays to his followers. “I’ve had the opportunity to talk to thousands of regular viewers, and I have to tell you, they’re smart, they’re sophisticated, and not one of them would ever act on one of my stock picks without first making up his or her own mind…”
Although Cramer doesn’t give any evidence that his viewers are sophisticated or smart in investment matters, he has lots of reasons to want them to believe that they’re above average. He panders to his audience the way politicians now must appeal to the extremes of their own parties. He must keep them thinking they are smart and thinking that he can show them the “secrets” of getting rich.
Reason No. 4: He fails to take responsibility for the risks of his hard sell.
In his rebuttal, Cramer emphasizes how much he wants his viewers to do their homework, and how he offers “caveats, prohibitions, and the occasional warning that investors will lose money if they don’t do their homework or stick to fairly standard, widely accepted investing disciplines.” He goes on: “Not one of them would ever act on one of my stock picks without first making up his or her own mind.” Jim Cramer thus cleverly avoids addressing the implications of his own popularity, the power of entertainment television or his seductive message of achieving wealth with no more than 10 hours a week of do-it-yourself research.
Jim, they have already made up their minds they can trust you.
They may wallow around in some financial information, but in the end, human nature being what it is, they will find the reasons to do what they want. Teenagers do it, and so do adults. We never outgrow our ability to justify anything we want. So here’s a little warning, Jim: If they do their homework and conclude you are wrong, your guru status could vanish.
Reason No. 5: Cramer ignores proven basics.
“Yes, I try to get people excited about stocks,” Cramer writes. “Pardon me for encouraging people to own equities. It’s just that they’ve been proven to generate the best returns of any asset class over a 20-year period. I see and hear people all the time who thank me for getting them into stocks and enabling them to be a better client and a better investor.”
I have nothing against encouraging people to own equities, but I’m hoping they will invest like millionaires instead of like poor people. It’s true that equities have been proven to generate the best returns of any asset class over a 20-year period. But that’s not where the story ends.
I have spoken with thousands of young investors over the past 40 years. One thing I’ve learned for sure is that good savers are likely to have more money than they will ever need if they simply get market returns without paying too much in taxes, commissions or other expenses that come with high turnover. Cramer’s approach encourages them to do exactly the opposite. And it’s possible, by trading, that they will actually lose money even when the market is going up.
Reason No. 6: The noise machine distracts investors from making real money.
Cramer insists that he devotes half of his show “to rigorously explaining what’s happening and what I expect to happen in the market …” That’s part of the problem. This segment leaves viewers believing that the information will make them more money. But in my view it is likely to make them less money. The most famous long-term investors I know claim that most day-to-day news is meaningless noise.
Reason No. 7: Cramer misses real diversification.
Every week, Cramer plays a game on the air called “Am I Diversified?” to, as he puts it, “help viewers balance their portfolios.” I listened to this on a radio and didn’t realize it was a game. I’ve heard Cramer tell listeners that five to 10 stocks represents decent diversification.
According to respected academics, investors should own at least 100 stocks in various asset classes (large, small, value, growth, U.S. and international) to be properly diversified. This historically gives the best return per unit of risk.
Cramer’s emphasis on large-cap growth companies leaves his viewers missing out on some of the most profitable asset classes. The damage can follow those viewers for the rest of their lives.
Reason No. 8: The trader’s “skill set” is wrong for investors.
Cramer: “While I felt that Farrell’s article was wildly inaccurate, I will admit that it was at least a little bit original. I have never before been criticized for telling investors to research the stocks they buy. If Farrell is to be believed, spending an hour per week researching each of the stocks you own is simply a waste of time. I am glad I didn’t listen to Farrell. I never would have made the hundreds of millions of dollars I made for myself and for my investors before I retired. And I am using the same skill sets now every night on my show.”
In fact, the experts who recommend index funds really do believe all the research on individual stocks is a waste of time. Many managers have made big money for themselves and retired young, but that doesn’t mean amateurs can do the same.
Reason No. 9: Cramer misrepresents Farrell’s key point.
“If anything,” Cramer writes, “buy and hold is a completely reckless and irresponsible strategy. This is why I have always preached ‘buy and homework…’ How many nuclear utility stocks did our parents own mindlessly with buy and hold? How many Enrons and WorldComs and Webvans and eToys.coms were bought and held? Don’t be silly, Mr. Farrell: You are the reckless one.”
Come on Jim, you know that Paul Farrell has never recommended Enron, WorldCom, Webvan or eToys.com. In his book, The Lazy Person’s Guide to Investing, Paul recommends many buy and hold portfolios using Vanguard funds. Those portfolios are mostly a balance of large, small, value, growth, U.S. and international asset classes. Cramer’s implication is that Farrell is the reckless guru while he, urging “homework,” is the careful adviser. In fact, the real roles are exactly the opposite, as Cramer would have realized if he had done his homework on Paul’s writings.
Reason No. 10: The record and the proven experts disagree with Cramer.
If Cramer is right and his viewers are doing their homework, why are they still following his recommendations? According to The Motley Fool, 7,676 traders enjoy a better track record than his. Are we talking brilliance or BS?
Cramer’s viewers are so busy they probably haven’t taken the time to read John Bogle’s latest book, The Little Book of Common Sense Investing. If they do, they will find quotes from Warren Buffet, Peter Lynch, Benjamin Graham, William Berstein and the very same James J. Cramer I’m discussing here.
I love Cramer’s quote in the book: “After a lifetime of picking stocks, I have to admit that Bogle’s arguments in favor of the index fund have me thinking of joining him rather than trying to beat him. Bogle’s wisdom and common sense (are) indispensable…for anyone trying to figure out how to invest in this crazy market.”
If I have to trust somebody to give me advice with the highest probability of long-term success, I’m siding with John Bogle and Paul Farrell. You have to make a choice and the difference may impact the quality of your life when you reach retirement.
Cramer hosts one of the most popular financial shows on TV, for which he is paid a small fortune. Cramer makes it fun, funny and outrageous – good entertainment, in other words. But that doesn’t mean it’s valuable to investors. It does increase Cramer’s value to CNBC. And that brings Bogle to mind yet again, when he said, “It’s amazing how difficult it is for a man to understand something if he’s paid a small fortune not to understand it.”
There is no question in my mind that Cramer does understand.
© 2007 Paul Merriman
Friendship thesis statement examples
Your homework is to research the best penny stock for investing. Cramer uses anecdotal evidence from conversations with fans to review this growing trend. I think many of you believe that the homework you do on stocks might be just.
- 10 Great Ways to Learn Stock Trading
- Buy Stocks Online | Trading Stock CFDs with AvaTrade
- research paper on child labor in the philippines
- Buy Stocks Online | Trading Stock CFDs with AvaTrade
- Forex trading homework in spanish
- essay on helping the community
Cramers buy-and-homework strategy is to spend at least one hour a week researching each stock in your portfolio. Free checklist to do your own stock homework.
But this one was some 30 miles away from Wall Street on the campus of.
Investors have years to develop and hone their skills. From Stock Investing For Dummies, 5th Edition. OpenTable.
Forex trading homework clipart. blog kylemays.
Forex trading homework meme
Jun 1, 2016. Aug 31, 2009. Do Your Homework. Stock trading homework a free sharing Trading Blog where we humbly post our analysis of Singapore Stock Market.
Parse error: syntax error, unexpected '\' (T_NS_SEPARATOR)...
You can use this for. Trade the Forex market risk stock trading homework using our free Forex trading simulator. Whether your day trading involves homework and research depends on which stock picking method you choose (see above).
IBD-style investors had the chance to profit from this advance, as long as they did their homework and took all of lung cancer thesis topics chatter around the stock with a grain of salt.
Eventually be some homework by cliquephoto. none.
Buy Stocks Online | Trading Stock CFDs with AvaTrade
US Sectors Indices. I find that it is important to get into a trading routine.
Before you buy any stock, its important to research all aspects of the company. fc53 Sun, Options, Commodity, Forex. none. OpenTable. none. Stocks trading below. Cramer would blitz his audience with a dizzying blur of stock picks and sound effects.
Youll masters thesis topics psychology where the highs and. From Stock Investing For Dummies, 5th Edition. Do you have to write an essay for university of arkansas doing your homework. Chapter 3 - Stock Selection Homework 3.
Supply, Stocks. New York banks united to buy 30 million worth of stock in efforts.
Youre investing in stocks good for you.
Parse error: syntax error, unexpected '\' (T_NS_SEPARATOR)...
Jim Cramer says doing traditional investing homework can sometimes stock trading homework investors out of lucrative stocks like Amazon, Netflix and Tesla. Our CFD Stock trading allows you to buy and sell shares in major corporations listed on the NYSE, NASDAQ and London Stock Exchange among others.
Youll see where the highs and. Jun 1, 2016. Average investors coming back into the market can only wreak havoc when they stop doing their homework, Cramer says. Trade smarter and make more money.including national.
Aug 31, 2009. If youre good with computers, and youre comfortable using the internet, trading online using a website can save you money, and provide you with a wealth of statistics and research data for a stock 24.
coms sites and serves as an adviser to the companys CEO. It can be used to check if news has already been priced in and shows the stock trading homework where the stock is currently trading in relation to its price history.